Geoengineering might not be so ludicrous an idea — if we gave Earth the right dose

TwitterFacebook

Solar geoengineering is widely viewed as risky business. 

The somewhat sci-fi concept — to use blimps, planes, or other means to load Earth’s atmosphere with particles or droplets that reflect sunlight and cool the planet — has crept into the mainstream conversation as a means of reversing relentless climate change, should our efforts to slash carbon emissions fail or sputter. But geoengineering schemes come with a slew of hazards. A number of studies have cited the ill consequences of messing with Earth’s sun intake, including big falls in crop production, the likelihood of unforeseen adverse side effects, and critically, a weakened water cycle that could trigger drops in precipitation and widespread drought. Read more…

More about Science, Global Warming, Extreme Weather, Climate Change, and Geoengineering

View More Geoengineering might not be so ludicrous an idea — if we gave Earth the right dose

Engineering Earth’s climate might quell global warming, but it could come with a cost

TwitterFacebook

When Mount Pinatubo violently erupted in 1991, the volcano blasted millions of tons of gas well over 20 miles into Earth’s atmosphere. After condensing into little droplets, the particles reflected sunlight back into space and cooled the planet by about 1 degree Fahrenheit for over year. 

Nearly three decades later, some scientists wonder if humans could effectively do the same thing — by using blimps, rockets, or planes — in the name of combating the increasingly ruinous consequences of global warming.

This geoengineering concept, however, may carry some unintended consequences — particularly when it comes to the world’s future food supply.  Read more…

More about Science, Global Warming, Climate Change, Geoengineering, and Volcanoes

View More Engineering Earth’s climate might quell global warming, but it could come with a cost